Talk:Public Lending Right

Untitled

I am not aware of any proposal for this in the US. Is there a reference for that sentence in the article?DGG 03:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've never head of any such proposal -- at least, no such proposal by any politician, government agency, or library. I'm sure that there are a few authors and publishers out there who think it's a great idea. If a source doesn't turn up RSN, then I think the reference to the U.S. ought to be pulled. 70.137.142.217 19:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need some clear ideas about PRL. can someone help me? - vimal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.160.153.5 (talk) 11:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

I just added the 1981 Thomas Stave Public Lending Right: a History of the Idea pdf from Library Trends to clarify one point. Someone could read the entire pdf and update this article. Pixpixpix (talk) 04:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Public Lending Right. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lede unclear

I suggest that the lede should spell out what PLR actually is: namely, a scheme whereby a library system pays money to authors based on how often their books are borrowed from it. At present, the article seems to assume that its readers already know this, and mentions payment to authors only further into the body of the article. I could try to do this myself, but my viewpoint would be excessively UK-centric, and I have no professional expertise in the area – an actual librarian, preferably with some international knowledge, would be far better able to improve the lede and the article overall. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.217.209.178 (talk) 23:20, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]