Talk:Public Land Law Review Commission

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

More information about the Commission

There is a lot more information about the commission here. The article should be expanded or else the link included.

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/10448879

Ileanadu (talk) 15:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final Report & Recommendations

The Commission submitted a report titled "One Third of the Nation's Lands" to the President and Congress on June 20th, 1970. The complete document is available from many locations.

Like all government commissions, the report itself provides a lot of detail about the members of the Commission and about the history of its establishment.

Available in pdf form:

http://leg.mt.gov/content/Committees/Interim/2013-2014/EQC/Meetings/September-2013/one-third-of-nation.pdf

Also available in full here: https://archive.org/details/onethirdofnation3431unit

Apparently one of the Commission's 137 recommendations was that federal government land be more open to being lost/transferred by Adverse Possession. This would seem to be an extremely controversial proposal that as far as I know was never implemented. See Adverse Possession against the United States - A Treasure for Trespassers, 26 Ark. L. Rev. 467 (1972-1973).

This issue is a topic of current interest because of the claims of (some of) the occupants of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge that they weren't engaged in a conspiracy to deprive federal government employees of access to the MNWLR but were trying to adversely possess the land. Ileanadu (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]