This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cody Ruest.
Biel: You added a number of tags. One indicating that the article cited no sources, one claiming that it is too long and one claiming it is using non-free material. Would be able to explain your line of thought here? It does cite sources, it is less than 25% of the length where you might want to even start considering splitting it just based on size, according to English Wikipedia standards and it's not clear what would be non-free. More detail would be appreciated, or it's difficult to act on it. /Julle (talk) 16:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Julle: Non-free because most of the references are not being cited completely, so the content of this article may be copied from somewhere, unsourced because it has no sources, reference 3 is just a link to buy the book and reference 1 has no link. Biel23:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, {{non-free}} has a rather specific use, though, and it's when there's too much non-free material included in the article.
These are printed sources, and printed sources are fully acceptable. We don't require links unless the source is a web page. (Most of the sources are still too unclear, though, they need full name and title.) /Julle (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]