Talk:Psychoorganic syndrome

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Critique for Psychology 101

This article has great potential because of its topic. While it is great to have given the general definition of Psychoorganic syndrome, the article could go on further to discuss it in detail. This is a pin-pointed topic, but it still has a lot of room to stretch. There are numerous things this article could discuss about psychoorganic syndrome. The article could talk about different symptoms of psychoorganic syndrome or about what causes it. It could go on to state whether or not there is any treatment for the syndrome, and if so, what? Is there any research being done about this syndrome? If so, what has been discovered, and what questions still need to be answered? When was psychoorganic syndrome first discovered? How many people does it affect today? Along with answering these questions, this article is also in need of a list or reliable references. Harkiran17 (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on all the facts stated up above about what could of been stated for this article. Since wikipedia is suppose to be a helpful source of information this topic should of been more educating to the readers. Ex: It stated that psyhoorganic syndrome was related to presenile dementia, what is that? The article was poor and could of being more detailed. Sydney lillady (talk) 01:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Sydney Taylor[reply]

Duplicate article

The exact same subject is featured at the Chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy article. Aszazin (talk) 11:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source 3 is not reliable

All the information it supports should be backed up with a reputable source for medical information (eg a journal) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malnu (talk • contribs) 18:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]