Talk:Pseudoxanthoma elasticum/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I am a reviewer ---kilbad (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take over this review. since above appears to be fake, comments soon Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead is a bit thin, doesn’t mention some of your major sections eg Epidemiology, History

Do you need so many short main sections?

Please check linking, many unfamiliar terms, like papular lesions and cutaneous laxity are not linked on first occurrence, although you’ve link skin, eyes and stomach, and the gene has three links

Other systems have become somewhat outdated by the discovery of the ABCC6 mutations. – vague, what other systems?

For excessive areas of skin – affected skin?

I'll read again tomorrow Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did give the user some feedback... just fyi. ---kilbad (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I accept good faith Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jim and Kilbad - I am currently returning from a Wikibreak and shall work on the above comments pretty soon. For ease of reference this is the diff for Kilbad's feedback. JFW | T@lk 14:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. This has gone on long enough. This GA fails. TeacherA (talk) 03:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. In the end, the new reviews offer some material that probably needed working into the article anyway. JFW | T@lk 21:51, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]