Talk:Prydain
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit]This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Map
[edit]This is one of the more ridiculous maps on Wikipedia. The starting point is that it has no date attached, whereas in fact the distribution of tribes on the island and, more especially the hegemony of one over others, was very dynamic. To suggest a common ethnicity for Northumbrians, Kentish men and West Cymry is ludicrous. Dalriadans are shown - yet what evidence is there that they were not "Britons" or "Cruithin"? None. So too with what the artist supposes to be "Pictland" (I presume). Let us suppose that this map is meant to date to 200 (the earliest conceivable date for Dalriada). At this point there were no "Picts" at all. And what about the Parisi? They were already entrenched on the North bank of the Humber by the time the Romans arrived 150 years earlier....
I could go on... Freuchie (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)