Talk:Proximal diabetic neuropathy

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Proximal diabetic neuropathy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Picture of fruit and vegetables

The picture of fruit and vegetables is completely irrelevant. OK to remove?10:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.8.4 (talk • contribs)

Removed. :)
JJ (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ICD-10 code

The correct ICD-10 codes for diabetic amyotrophy would be E10.44 for DM type 1 and E11.44 for DM type 2--205.175.158.150 (talk) 17:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article is whack

it's listed as being in "Urology", there's a picture of root levels when this is a plexus injury affecting the anterior thigh/abductors/adductors primarily, the EMG picture is some sort of weird research EMG or something, and in reality we'd call a plexopathy in a diabetic as diabetic amyotrophy on routine NCS/EMG if we see it...barring some other kind of reason to have a plexopathy, which is unlikely - from the description it sounded like the diagnosis is somehow really difficult (nerve conduction studies/EMG ARE electrodiagnostic testing by the way). I'm a physician who is too timid to start editing these pages directly, but what's there seems pretty off

--- OK I fixed all this stuff

it's also not "low importance", I'm not sure what that means for medicine, it's a real thing that affects people in a large way — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlamNo7 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A. agreed, this is certainly not of low importance considering that: 1. it is disabling 2. it is reflective of an underlying disorder that can cause multi-organ damage.

B. Furthermore, the statement that 'Diabetic neuropathy is an uncommon complication of diabetes.' is erroneous. C. There are grammatical errors that contribute to this overall poorly written piece. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaverickDoctor (talk • contribs) 15:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]