Talk:Prosthetic makeup

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Limited references

It seems this page has only links for a single site, and gets most info from that site also. There is nothing wrong with that, except more variety should be provided. Also the site only presents womans makeup. This is not at all ok in an enciclopedia, I think. --Rnbc 21:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There were a few other links to one other site, but they were all completely broken. I agree that it is disappointing that the only site that can be found that shows this type of information only covers females, even if some are transformed into males. Similar sites for males wearing prosthetic makeup would be great but I've searched a number of times and not found any. If you can find some suitable links, it'd be great. --AliceJMarkham 22:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact cite reference number 1 claims to be a link to a page that describes the process of making prosthetics, as though it were a tutorial; and instead it's a link to a store that sells products! I don't think it's considered encyclopedic to be propagandizing merchandise. --Lwangaman (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or keep separate?

This seems to be on a similar topic, but have more information than, the article Facial prosthetic. Now, there's already an article on Craniofacial prosthesis, which are facial prosthetics for medical purposes, and currently the facial prosthetic article is mostly about prosthetic make-up. So, I was wondering, should facial prosthetic and this article, prosthetic make-up be merged, or should facial prosthetic be kept as an article about facial prosthetics in general, meaning containing information on both prosthetic makeup, meaning prosthetics for non-medical purposes such as theatre, TV, and film, and Craniofacial prosthesis, meaning prosthetic for medical purposes? Kevin 20:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the idea of merging the articles, and having subheadings for the medical and theatrical versions. In fact, I think I suggesated it in one of the articles' talk pages several months ago. --AliceJMarkham 04:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I wanted to add a picture to one of these articles, but I'm too afraid of the monumental selection of copyrights to do so. I already mentioned that on Talk:Facial_prosthetic, but no one seems to come to these articles very often, and I haven't gotten an answer in 10 days. Anyway, is there someplace else I could ask questions about picture copyrights besides a seldom-visited talk page? Kevin 20:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are specific wiki pages for those subjects. I'd suggest you start at WP:IUP. --AliceJMarkham 04:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

This article is currently far from being encyclopedic.

The "The Makeup Gallery" section, which I have retitled as "Notable examples" is a fairly random assortment of links.
The categories of makeup are listed inline to this list, but never defined in the article, only through external links
No sources are listed, and many unproven claims are made ("the most...", etc.)
The techniques section provides a description of a single specific technique as opposed to a generic explanation of the steps needed.
The history is listed merely as a list of contributors.

This article needs a major rewrite. I reccomend sources including:

Stage Makeup by Richard Corson
Techniques of the Three Dimensional Makeup Artist by Lee Baygan
Mark Alfrey's Prosthetic Make-Up for Beginners (Video)
Creating Character Prosthetics in Silicone (Video) by Niel Gorton

I'll get on this when I can. If anyone wishes to beat me to it, I'd love you for it. -Verdatum (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glue/adhesive

What type of glue or adhesive is used with this type of makeup? -- Beland (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit gum I think

Why in God's name does this take so long to apply?

It seriously blows how many movies and tv shows have had to either limit these kinds of characters or have trouble getting actors to portray them because of how freakin' long the makeup takes to apply... can't they speed it up a tad? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Prosthetic makeup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]