Jump to content

Talk:Prophetic medicine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kareena.agni.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 18 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ucasocom.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Prophetic medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Prophetic medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prophetic medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should Camel urine be included within this prophetic medicine article ?

[edit]

Pinging Wikipedians who have previously contributed to this issue. 39.37.170.148, Mr.Sarcastic, Roxy the dog, 119.152.136.93, SharabSalam

To seek a consensus on the resolution of[1]

Camel urine

It is advocated by Muhammad. It is as much a prophetic medicine as are black seeds or honey. It is recommended by Saudi Universities. It is drunk in Saudi Arabia and Yemen. It is considered an alternative medicine. It is not recommended for drinking by the WHO. Its inclusion meets WP:PGs.

From the above and with WP:NOTCENSORED

YES include 'Camel urine' within 'Prophetic medicine' Koreangauteng (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was consensus not to include the content on camel urine in the very article on camel urine. It would not make any sense for there to be an opposing consensus in a separate article.
The problem is that you are combining sources to make an overall statement that are not explicitly stated by the source themselves.
You need a source that explicitly identifies camel urine as a noteworthy part of the tradition prophetic medicine tradition. You can't just use your interpretation of a a primary source.
You need an independent source that shows that Saudi universities recommend it that explicitly identifies it as a part of prophetic medicine. A cherry-picked study does not show that it's widespread or taught by universities, or that the author wasn't joking or something. Even a source that says that Saudi universities teach it but that does not use the words "prophetic medicine" would not be adequate for this article. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, these sources should really be written by mainstream medical professionals, not the people who believe this stuff, not by sensationalist news writers who are just looking for clicks. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not ping me. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 11:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Koreangauteng, the Islam.ru and Islam.web sites explicitly identify blackseeds with prophetic medicine and the hadith cited, unlike your WP:SYNTH edits but if you want to edit just to prove a point, go ahead. The Islamqa removal was justified. 39.37.170.148 (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of Miswak/Siwak

[edit]

Hello,

given this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miswak#Hadiths_concerning_the_miswak (Hadiths quoting Muhammad as recommending the use of a miswak plus the widespread adhesion of this advice in the muslim world), the section Recommandations could (or should) include a Miswak entry, don't you think? (-: 2A01:CB04:BC:3200:A938:9240:D175:E6AD (talk) 23:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Prophetic_medicine&oldid=1207814767"