Talk:Prony's method
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
How is it that there are only N samples for F(n) whereas the matrix equation makes use of F from 0 to 2N-1? Bsofly 16:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Formulation is clearly wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.203.193.252 (talk) 19:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
The formulation is correct. See Eq. 11 of the citation [1]. --Chassin (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Error regarding minus signs
[edit]In the article I read:
"Because the summation of complex exponentials is the homogeneous solution to a linear difference equation, the following difference equation will exist:
The key to Prony's Method is that the coefficients in the difference equation are related to the following polynomial:
- "
Considering the single-mode situation, where:
we clearly have:
- .
Transforming this into a difference equation (whether or not this is the same as Z-transforming, I am not completely sure, but I am more or less following from the article), we get:
- .
But this difference equation, according to the notation of the second equation quoted from the article, corresponds to:
- ,
with a minus sign in front of , so we can identify:
- .
Substituting this into the first equation quoted from the article, as it is until now, with , yields:
- ,
which clearly contradicts the second equation derived by me.
I conclude that the minus sign on the right-hand side of the first equation quoted above is erroneous, and that a similar flaw is present in the first matrix-vector equation in the article, as it is until now. I will therefore correct these errors shortly.Redav (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)