Talk:Promoter bashing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Promoter bashing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Digest-based promoter bashing vs. mutation-based promoter bashing

It seems there are two common ways to perform promoter bashing — by removing elements from the promoter in a restriction digest, and by mutating elements of the promoter. I feel that when I was elaborating on the procedure, I wasn't clear enough that both methods are used. Additionally, I was only able to find sources describing mutation-based promoter bashing. — RC Howe (talk) 00:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some information about 3' vs. 5' deletions, and found a (decent) source for deletion-based promoter bashing. I'm also wondering about the procedure: it was there when I started working on the page and I've improved it a little, but I don't see many procedures on other molecular biology pages, so maybe this should be changed to add a procedure on a vendor's site under a "further reading" section or something like that. — RC Howe (talk) 23:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]