Talk:Proletarian nation

Unacceptable source

~~Scribd is a user generated content website. Anyone can post anything from there! The current linked document is not acceptable. Please find or cite a WP:RS. Phearson (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

Okay, you just don´t gave me time for fixing it. I´m fixing your concerns and if you don´t got any other issue, we will maintain the article for the encyclopedia.--Tercerista (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen you have fixed it. Complaint withdrawn. Good Job! Phearson (talk) 02:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, it was a major issue.--Tercerista (talk) 02:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third-party research, more sources required

it identified "class struggle between nations", and sought to resolve internal class struggle in the nation while it identified Germany as a proletarian nation fighting against plutocratic nations.[2]

This doesn't seem very well sourced for such a substantial claim. This is the first time i've read this claim too, and i know of no german source from the era confirming this research/claim. Unless there's no actual historical source or a quote from some official authoritative figure confirming this alleged "Class struggle between nations" to have existed as a concept in natsoc political thought i would identify this entry as unreliable, with further research being required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.254.40.38 (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced by much of this article (although it used to be much worse). That material is technically supported by the cited source. It seems to be an OK source but it is only one and wouldn't appear to be in the top-tier of historical writings on Nazism. I guess that reflects the bigger problem about the emphasis being put on this relatively obscure concept, which, as you suggest, is rarely identified as a key theme of fascism, let alone of Nazism. N-HH talk/edits 10:05, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]