Talk:Project Pegasus
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Pegasus Project Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Pegasus Project |
This article was nominated for deletion on 30 October 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Features of the Marvel Universe. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Colon
[edit]Note: this was a requested article by WikiProject Comics under it's proper name of Project: Pegasus (with the ":" colon). However, because of Wikipedia's naming conventions a Project with a colon does not appear to be an option as a stand alone article, being intended for groups of Wikipedia articles. I've corrected this and started it, but to be honest I only ever read the one storyline back in the day so can't really do a full article on the many times it's been used as a location in comics. -Markeer 23:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like the Ultimate version doesn't have the colon - it's just Project Pegasus, not Project: Pegasus --Mrph 00:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Subjects
[edit]Not happy with the heading of subjects - either in a jurisidictional sense or for at least some on the list in a study sense - The Squadron Supreme were quests of the project as arranged by Quasar. Will have a think about how to reword it. WillE (talk) 12:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Andrew Basiago Project Pegasus time travel edits
[edit]This is clearly not the right article for text about Andrew Basiago's alleged time travel experiences. This article is about comic books. If it meets Wikipedia's standards an article on the alleged time travel project should be created separately, e.g. "Project Pegasus (time travel)" or "Project Pegasus (government project)". As a reminder, such an article is more likely to belong on the site if it is based on verifiable third-party sources and written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not the place to claim that something disputed is true. It can be a place to acknowledge and document the dispute and articulate the differing views. And it is definitely not a forum for publishing original research. -Thomas Craven (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)