Talk:Project Jupyter

Categories

Please help me improve the categories of open source advocates (people) and "free and open-source software organizations" (organizations).

Added category "Free and open-source software organizations"

Removed category "Open Source Advocates" from Project Jupyter, an organization, added this category to person Fernando Perez (software developer) who is one of sthe originator of the project mentioned in the article.

Happy to discuss here Spohrer (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

"IPython Notebook" or "IPython Notebooks"?

Sub section Jupyter Notebook:

Should it be "IPython Notebook" or "IPython Notebooks"?

--Mortense (talk) 14:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Sources

I work on d:Wikidata:Scholia. Lots of wiki people like Jupyter and I was talking with someone about Wikidata + Scholia + Jupyter. I was looking at this article and thinking about the sources. Right now, this article is in rough shape and does not cite academic sources. In Scholia somehow 5 academic sources are there and more may appear in the future. See Scholia profile of Jupyter.

Here are two I like -

• Helen Shen (5 November 2014). "Interactive notebooks: Sharing the code". Nature. 515 (7525): 151–152. doi:10.1038/515151A. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 25373681. Wikidata Q28851715.
• Thomas Kluyver; Benjamin Ragan-Kelley; Fernando Pérez; et al. (2016), Jupyter Notebooks—a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows, pp. 87–90, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87, Wikidata Q28846483

Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Information about responses

In "Media coverage", shouldn't some of the responses be summarised? --Mortense (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Galileo Manuscript

Why is there an image of Galileo's notebook here?

2600:1700:C280:1CF0:B5DD:E3B6:1965:8E8E (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

This is stated in the intro:

Project Jupyter's name is a reference to the three core programming languages supported by Jupyter, which are Julia, Python and R, and also a homage to Galileo's notebooks recording the discovery of the moons of Jupiter.

-- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 19:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

This manuscript was shown in 2022 to be fake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droodman (talk • contribs) 15:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Primary sources tag

I deleted a lot of information sourced only to primary sources, without secondary sources to assert importance, and I added new secondary source citations. Of the 25 citations, 12 are now to secondary sources. Is this sufficient to drop the primary sources tag? I have a COI (I work on JupyterLab in a professional capacity) so I will not remove it myself. White 720 (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)