Talk:Project Isinglass/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Project Isinglass. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Merge and re-direct
To clean up, I propose to merge any non-redunant information from ISINGLASS with "Project Isinglass", and then turn "ISINGLASS" into a redirect to "Project Isinglass". Comments? -- Enemenemu (talk) 22:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree, this article was started as a content dupe, and its name is wrong, the name is ISINGLASS, not Isinglass. You need to merge it into ISINGLASS.- Wolfkeeper 15:20, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, looking at the references, this article describes ISINGLASS, while the other article in question, despite its title, actually describes RHEINBERRY. So I'm going to propose these articles for renaming as such. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 04:31, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Snow close as do not move to these names, per WP:ALLCAPS, WP:MOSCAPS and WP:MOSTM. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 20:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Project Isinglass → Project ISINGLASS — The Project Isinglass page, which describes the aircraft the page says it does, should have the code-name capitalised, as that is the proper format for code-names of this nature (and is used in the references). The ISINGLASS article, seeming to be a duplicate or content fork at first blush, quickly can be seen to be describing an entierly different aircraft proposal - which based on its reference is actually the RHEINBERRY aircraft. As Project RHEINBERRY throws up big red letters in the move page saying that name is on the title blacklist, I'm requesting assistance in putting these pages in their proper place, as it were. Thanks! The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 04:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. WP:MOSCAPS and WP:MOSTM discourage the use of all caps for stylistic purposes unless we are talking about an acronym - which does not appear to be the case here. --DAJF (talk) 13:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, no need to shout. =) Powers T 14:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose – per WP:MOSTM & WP:ALLCAPS. 「ɠu¹ɖяy」¤ • ¢ 04:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Project Isinglass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323061602/http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001472040/0001472040_0008.gif to http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001472040/0001472040_0008.gif
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308121747/http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0000645397/0000645397_0049.gif to http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0000645397/0000645397_0049.gif
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=dti&id=news%2FDTIHSV.xml&headline=Sandia%20Materials%20Enable%20Hypersonic%20Flight
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)