Jump to content

Talk:Project 562

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This article is flagged as "reading like an advertisement". However, there is no indication of self promotion, or means of financial transaction. The sources cited are academic, or informational in nature.

It reads like any format for a biography or project description.

This article has also been marked as an orphan page. However, it is clearly linked to other Wikipedia pages and has been cited to external sources.

Shanay m5 (talk) 00:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the "Description" section, adding additional background information on Project 562. I've also added an artist biography, since Wilbur doesn't have her own page. I renamed "Participants and Support" to "Partners and Affiliates." I added the section "Reach and Influence" detailing her TED talk in 2014. I added an additional exhibition. I also added additional links.

Boundless editor (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't usually discuss Kickstarter campaigns unless they have substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources. Has this? – Brianhe (talk) 05:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MarcoK15. Peer reviewers: DruGreenwood.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible plagiarism

[edit]

MarcoK15 - it would appear that the content that you added is almost word for word from the Radcliff Institute article https://www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/news/in-news/seeds-culture-matika-wilbur-tells-womens-stories I have concerns over plagiarism. Please consider a rewrite of your content. Indigenous girl (talk) 12:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios reverted and redacted. User warned. - CorbieV 19:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The background information is solid and you do a good job of describing the intent and purpose of the work. The page layout is well organized and reads well--adding reach and influence really strengthens this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DruGreenwood (talkcontribs) 18:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]