Talk:Progressive dispensationalism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Progressive dispensationalism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge to Dispensationalism ?

Discuss here also. DFH 18:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What would be some reasons for merging this entry with dispensationalism? Personally I favor keeping the progressive dispensationalism entry separate from the dispensationalism page. In the past some thought the dispensationalism page was becoming too large and unwieldy and so spun off a dispensationalist theology page. Also Hyperdispensationalism is also another type of dispensationalism which has and needs its own page. Lamorak 17:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge. They are distinct theologies that should not be conflated. Biasedbulldog 20:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robert H. Gundry

Gundry is not a progressive dispensationalist, so the section on his eschatological posttribulational views will be removed. The vast majority of progressive dispensationalists hold to a pretribulation rapture, just as the vast number of revised dispensationalists also do. Lamorak (talk) 03:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the vast majority of progressives hold to pre-tribulationism naturally means that not all hold to it; this is a distinction that should be noted in an informational article. For that reason, I've edited the beginning of the second sentence under the "Comparison" heading to reflect the "vast majority" wording, and noted that there are variations where the rapture question is concerned. I don't know of any other major variations, as I've never heard of a progressive dispensationalist who denied a distinction between the church and Israel, a seven year tribulation, or a literal 1000 reign of Christ.Phoenix1861 (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another New Covenant View

Dispensationalist Arnold Fruchtenbaum (not a progressive dispensationalist) argues for another view of the Covenants, that the Gentiles in the body of Christ have entered into the spiritual blessings of applicable Covenants. For example, they do not enter into the Land Covenant, which promises physical blessing to the people of Israel, but they do enter into the spiritual blessings of the New Covenant, i.e., knowng God and a new heart and forgiveness of sins through the Messiah Jesus. The literal fulfillment of the New Covenant however, is during the Millennium.

I do not have the citation at this time. Perhaps this can be attributed and worked in to the section "Progressive" relationship between the covenants.Caryw777 (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Progressive dispensationalism.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]