Talk:Progressive Social Networks

A fact from Progressive Social Networks appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Mexican political party Progressive Social Networks allowed party members to vote in internal elections using a smartphone app?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Progressive Social Networks.

Wikipedia

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Mexican political party Progressive Social Networks allowed party members to vote in internal elections using a smartphone app? Source: https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/nacion/inicia-redes-sociales-progresistas-proceso-de-eleccion-interna-en-urnas-electronicas

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Proposed Soviet invasion of Hokkaido

Created by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 02:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems: - The article describes Elba Esther Gordillo as corrupt, but the source doesn't seem to say that specifically. I think we need a citation for the corruption claim per WP:BLP.

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I'm a new reviewer, so would be grateful for a second opinion. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mx. Granger: You might want to consult the lead of Elba Esther Gordillo. If it weren't that obvious, I wouldn't have put it there. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The Forbes source cited in that article says that she was "perceived to be among the most corrupt" and had been charged (though not convicted) with embezzlement. It seems obvious to me that Gordillo is corrupt, but I think we still need to cite it in the article per WP:BLP. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mx. Granger: Done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm still not sure that source works for this claim, as (outside the headline) it just says that she's perceived to be corrupt, not that she actually is corrupt. But I'll leave that subtlety to others' judgement. Otherwise the article looks good.

—Granger (talk · contribs) 07:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]