Talk:Program temporary fix

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

It has been suggested that portions of this article be moved into SMP/E. (Discuss)

Don't merge this in to SMP/E as it applies to way more IBM products than just the mainframe line, for example AIX and Tivoli products. 202.36.29.1 (talk) 22:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC) CJE[reply]

Notability

I deleted the "notability" issue. A quick google search ptf ibm -"ibm.com" turns up 1,390,000 hits. Looking at the first few pages I see lots of mentions in magazine articles, etc. and this mostly excludes hits from IBM sites. This topic has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Peter Flass (talk) 12:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nonstandard term HA

The article uses the term HA for a non-production system. I've been dealing with SMP and PTFs for decades, and have never seen the term. I suspect that it is a local term for a development or QA LPAR, but it is certainly not anything in common parlance. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 03:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible that the editor meant Quality Assurance (QA)? --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. That seems to fit.Peter Flass (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Service cycle

The description of the service cycle is seriously flawed. An RSU may contain thosands of PTFs; installing them one at a time is not practical. Further, it is normal to receive warnings about holds. Under most circumstances you let SMP exclude PTFs with holds, except for cases where you have determined that it is safe to bypass the hold or where you need a PTF in error because of a more serious issue. Some installations funnel service through muliple stages, e.g., development, test, QA and production.

Further, the section is specific to OS/360 and successors, other IBM operating systems use other service vehicles, e.g., VMSES/E for z/VM.Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Organization

I've created a new section, Program temporary fix#PTF installation; it needs information on the maintenance vehicle for, e.g., AIX, z/VM, z/VSE, as well as information on distribution and packaging of service for each platform. Some information can be moved from Program temporary fix#PTF usage but most needs to be added by an SME. I've added {{expand section}} templates to both sections, pointing to #Service cycle for discussion.

I'm not sure whether it's best to have subsections for each platform, or to make the platforms the main sections with Installation and Usage subsections. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In any case the new section consists only of unsourced material. It needs to be sourced. TJRC (talk) 16:31, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]