Talk:Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 21 September 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angelicality7, Wojcickij, Winniefan, AKtheMedStudent. Peer reviewers: Chnava.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): XiaoyaZ.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The topic of the Comprehensive Care Management article the not sufficiently notable on its own, and there is large amount of duplicate/shared material between it & the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly article. Likewise the advertisement issues with Comprehensive Care Management could be taken care of by the careful selection of what material to bring over as part of the merge. -- 12.106.111.10 18:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Workplan

Much of the article is derived directly from other source text. There are minimal citations, especially those from independent, peer-reviewed sources. The History section is dense and hard to follow. The article lacks a neutral tone.

Plan to add Eligibility, Financing section, and Program Outcomes section. Remove extraneous history information and condense it into a bullet-pointed list. Reduce sensationalism. Rephrase text to be in our own words. Rename “How it works” to “Description.” Angelicality7 (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]