Talk:Progesterex

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 6 July 2022, see discussion.
Keep, 5 January 2008, see discussion.

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Progesterex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Hi! Can we find some reliable sources for this page? Maybe even more notable examples of where the drug "caused" sterilization? Here is my evaluation of the Progesterex article:

The lead for Progesterex started off good and contained the key aspects listed above. After the lead is where the problems begin. All the sections except two lack any form of citations, including a long, word-for-word section about an email. The tone of the article is note neutral and only includes one side of the story from an un-cited email. The citations that the article does have are not from reliable sources and include news articles as well as unrelated sources that do not speak directly about the topic. The lack of reliable information and notability ruins any possibility of the article being well written. According to the talk page, the Progesterex page has been rated as a Start-class and has very few edits, even considered for deletion in 2008 but was kept after discussion. Overall, I am very disappointed in the Progesterex Wikipedia page and hope it receives some serious revision. Tamashi2314 (talk) 05:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]