Talk:Professional communication
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Removing content on degree programs
[edit]I'm removing the content on degree programs. Unless someone wishes to take on the endeavor of collecting a list of all Professional Communication graduate programs, this section approaches (or is on its face) an encroachment into the neutrality of the article as a whole. Wolfraem (talk) 21:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
More than one theory in "Professional Communication Theory"?
[edit]The section currently contains a single (though rather massive) quote on the definition of Professional Communication. According to the revision history, the user that added it is Rfreed, an avatar whose master may very well be the Mr. Richard Freed quoted. This doesn't violate any Wikipedia laws, though it is perhaps a bit assuming to fill the article with only one's own ideas and not perform due diligence in sourcing additional viewpoints.
That said, I plan to thin the included quote and add additional perspectives. Just an FYI, I guess. Wolfraem (talk) 21:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: 2023SP Communication Research Methods
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2023 and 11 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bbrock44, Spicyjennd, BeansOnToast01 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Spicyjennd.
— Assignment last updated by Fortin43 (talk) 06:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)