Talk:ProfNet
 | The contents of the ProfNet page were merged into PR Newswire#ProfNet on 4 September 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
I ran through this article and pulled any qualitative (marketing) modifiers (convenient was the only one I pulled). It is intended to be informative only, not prejudicial. The term "expert" is not a qualitative reference, rather it is a reference to "expert news sources" that the media uses to support arguments in an article, etc. That's the main function of this company, to provide a resource for journalists and event planners, etc., to get into contact with knowledgeable sources of information on the subject that they are covering, frequently from the acedemic community.
I'd greatly appreciate any help on how else I could modify this article. Thank you.
Merger?
[edit]I'm not tagging the article right now, but it seems like this article should be merged into PR Newswire. Arllaw (talk) 22:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)