Talk:Proexaeretodon
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revalidated?
[edit]The article says the species (and hence genus) was revalidated. However, the source given says "we consider P. vincei to be valid. Nonetheless, we are aware that a deep revision and stronger evidence is needed to support or reject the synonymy of these taxon [sic]." I've fixed the taxobox by creating a taxonomy template, but I think this article is premature. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class animal articles
- Low-importance animal articles
- Wikipedia requested images of animals
- WikiProject Animals articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles