Talk:Product and manufacturing information

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Industrial design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

The last one-sentence paragraph of this article makes little sense. "For anyone to be able to display any kind of PMI View, Adobe Systems has unified their format and added their description to the PDF format (version 1.7)." Who is "anyone?" People can't display PMI Views. CAD or viewing applications can. What is the meaning of "Adobe Systems has unified their format and added their description to the PDF format." The PDF format is Adobe's and now incorporates 3D representations. I guess what the author was driving at is that Adobe's 3D PDF can display PMI on 3D models provided that the CAD System that has generated a model has attached PMI to it. I suggest the last sentence be rewritten to clarify the author's intent. And if the assertion is true (I myself haven't seen it), then applicable Adobe documents should be cited.Cyon Steve (talk) 23:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update the article

I'm looking at an update to this article, but it is hard to find non-vendor sources. The best explanation I can find from a more neutral source is [1]. Anyway, I'm looking to clean up this article a bit to be better organized and more accurate. Any help would be appreciated. For example, the description found at the link above much more clearly describes PMI in one paragraph than this whole article does in 3. — fcsuper^{(How's That?, That's How!)} _{(Exclusionistic Immediatist )}— 20:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]