Jump to content

Talk:Product Recall/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 05:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • What roles did Jim Jansen and Anthony Russell portray?
  • I've added the characters into the infobox, and mentioned Jansen's name in the synopsis
  • The plot section links to Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse, but nothing ever officially notes that the two are the subject of the story. It would be better to note they were the intended satire in the "Cultural References" section to avoid the implication.
  • I just decided to remove the references entirely, as I couldn't find anything reliable on it. One source amusingly wrote that the episode used a "non-copyrighted duck and a non-copyrighted mouse," but that's really it.
  • Production section mentions Barbara Allen, it would help to link to the appropriate person's article.
  • Done.
  • You mention Angela in "Production." You should link to her article and note her actress. Same for Kevin in the "Cultural references" section and Jan in the "Reception" section.
  • Done.
  • The guest actors and some of their roles are listed in the infobox, but they do not appear in the prose. They should be included there, as well as cited to a source.
  • I've cited the actors to the episode, per the standard (they're listed in the closing credits). Rashida Jones and Anthony Russell, alas, do not appear in the prose because their characters don't do anything relevant to the plot.
  • "For its timeslot, the episode finished in second place among adults and in first place among men aged 18-34." -- which show beat it out?
  • Ironically (considering the episode director), Survivor: Fiji did. I've added it in.
  • Duplicate links tool returns one result: "CNN"
  • Done.
  • Checklinks returns no problems with the disambiguation links. Dablinks tool shows no problem with disambiguations.
Will place the article on hold pending improvements. Overall not far from the mark. —Ed!(talk) 05:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Again, thanks very much for this review and all of the others you've been doing! Your efforts are very appreciated. Ruby 2010/2013 22:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great work again, passing the GA. Keep the episodes coming! —Ed!(talk) 23:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]