Talk:Problems of Onomastics

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 July 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep, changed to merge after a deletion review.

Academic Journals

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Delayed open access?

The infobox says delayed open access after 2 years, but the newest content I can access is issue 9, which is 4 years old. Anyone know if it's supposed to be 4 years, or if they're just behind? Dcs002 (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not unusual for borderline journals like this (not produced by a professional publisher) to be behind. Perhaps they say something about free access on their website. --Randykitty (talk) 10:43, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge target?

So we have a merge closure to the DRV, but with which article shall this be merged? The Russian Language Institute article is a stub. I added the list of journals it publishes, but merging Problems of Onomastics with that article will make it quite lopsided. As it stands, that article has only one independent source and is vulnerable for the chopping block. Ural Federal University is a nice looking article, but it has none of its own journals listed. I am willing to put as much time and effort into making the merge work as I did working on editing this one (and indeed as much as I did arguing during the AfD and DRV), but which article should it be merged with? (As the DRV was closed as a "Merge", I have reverted the article back to the 07:21, 21 August 2014‎ version, as last edited by Randykitty.) Dcs002 (talk) 01:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have cut down the information to the essential and merged it to a separate section under "academic journals" in the RLI article. This way, that article gets more "meaty" and a similar approach can be followed for any of their other journals that might be worthwhile. --Randykitty (talk) 08:05, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the current state of this page, would it make sense to come up with some sort of description of the other journals from the RLI, even if not well sourced, just to have some basic (non-contentious) info? Dcs002 (talk) 22:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- IMO, some mention should be given to the previous incarnation, as the current Problems of Toponomastics has in some way inherited the collection and hosts it online. Don't know if they inherited full copyright or publishing rights though. Dcs002 (talk) 22:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]