Talk:Probainognathia

Animals Low‑importance

Probainognathia is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About Probainognathia

First of all they are synapsids not amphibians or reptiles. The connection with Wikiproject amphibians and reptiles was out of place.

Second of all there is no contradiction between this article on the Probainognathia and the Trithelodontidae, although they both could stand some improvement in their presentation. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 22:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on how you define reptile doesn't it? Keeping in mind PhyloCode doesn't exist yet so all definitions in current use must be considered valid. MMartyniuk (talk) 23:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]