Jump to content

Talk:Pro-war rhetoric

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why No Anti-War Rhetoric Page?

[edit]

Is this yet more proof of Wiki's socialist/left wing bias? I think so. The reference materials used for this article are nothing more than manuals on how to be a left winger. Ymous 14:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though the text is less impressive, there is substantial work of art and style given to all of the liberal motifs of peace, love, and homosexuality. Jessemckay (talk) 00:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a "Pro-War Rhetoric" page and an "Anti-War Movement" page, but no "Anti-War Rhetoric" or "Pro-War Movement" page. I would say the best course of action would be to delete this page and instead create a "Anti-War Movement" page. This would increase consistency and reduce bias. 74.105.10.169 (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duties

[edit]

A declaration of war is an official act, usually not a rhetoric event, apart from the public announcement which addresses the masses to mobilize support. However, the popular "pro-war" rhetoric which isn't reflecting indoctrination and propaganda, is about patriotism, and the duties to fulfill to serve the country. Please try to edit less politicized. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Ronald Reid´s Three Topoi is very similar in content with the one on Pro-war rhetoric. In addition, it is an orphan. I propose to keep the Pro-war rhetoric article because it has a more general title and has a relevant number of incoming links Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]