Talk:Priyadarshini Mattoo

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Delhi Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Is this appropriate reporting style or should we add a disclaimer?

Guess it might draw a bit of criticism in my name but the Priyadarshini Mattoo case is one of the few high profile cases that was widely covered by the media and other sources. However, the word by word statement from the media has been reported as a report in this Encyclopedia. Just wondering whether it is appropriate for Wikipedia. I guess, this makes an interesting read for any one who wants to read about the media coverage and versions of the story but I guess it is better if this came with a bit of hindsight to the reader stating that this is not an investigation report but an aggregate of all media reportings of the issue.

- Theruvath Prasanth Mathew

Theruvath Prasanth Mathew 16:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The case which has re-iterated the publics belief on the legal system in india. Deep Kumar

Very interesting case - Ummer

The conviction will most probably be challenged in the Supreme Court of India, but the verdict and the process is seen as a barometer of a changing India. In particular, it is hoped now that media pressure can be brought to bear in the case of prominent accused such as Manu Sharma or Vikas Yadav or Sanjeev Nanda, and that eventually, the ability of the powerful to remain above the law would be curtailed.

NPOV?? AD

NPOV

The points of the primarily about the DNA test and Trail by Media have been added in the appeal to Supreme court column .Those are the 2 main points for NPOV.They have been added Harlowraman 14:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Priyadarshini Mattoo.jpg

Image:Priyadarshini Mattoo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Priyadarshini Mattoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]