Talk:Privilege (Catholic canon law)
Appearance
"non-constructive"?
[edit]@GhostInTheMachine: I do not see how putting this page into the a narrower category is "non-constructive". Veverve (talk) 01:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. The category change was OK. You also set the Short description to "legal concept in the in Catholic canon law" – which start with a lower case letter and is garbled – so I wanted to revert that. The "undo" tool however works back from the current state and so undid all 3 changes, which was sadly rather overzealous — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Book censorship
[edit]Considering the previous centuries-long relationship of the church and its law with censorship and publication "with privilege" (Latin: cum privilegio) across Western Europe, that concept and phrasing needs to be glossed here or its separate existence noted, if it's legally distinct from the topic here. — LlywelynII 00:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)