Talk:Privia

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 January 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Musical Instruments Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What about 410r?

Anyone knows something about it? Khullah (talk) 06:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Writing style

I think this article is partially written like an advertisement: "dynamics that are seamlessly articulated", "known to have excellent quality piano sounds" --Querda (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bobsmellsbad (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)I agree. In fact I agree so much that I created my wikipedia account just now so that I could basically comment to that effect. It reads like a brochure or sales pitch; highly subjective rather than objective. It's mostly harmless, although I'm sure that others in the same space might have a thing or two to say about "...The Privia series has also been known to have excellent quality piano sounds and effects comparable to its competitors like Yamaha, Roland, and Kawai..." I have nothing against this brand, in fact I came to this page because I'm a potential customer seeking impartial information. However, being new to wikipedia I'm uncertain as to the steps to rectify this. Any tips would be great.[reply]

@Querda: I fixed it mostly. @Bobsmellsbad: Try looking at Sweetwater for info/reviews. Eman235/talk 07:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"heavier"

"...and considered as being heavier than a generic acoustic piano keys." Please specify what "heavier" is referring to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:540:C400:8C80:8053:1A72:7EC9:82B4 (talk) 17:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

based model

Which pianoforte is based for each Privias? (e.g. was a Hamburg Steinway actually used for modelling the “Grand Piano 1” in the px-100?) 2001:FB1:47:8C58:6819:4F52:C08A:A33C (talk) 23:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]