Talk:Prismacolor
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
It should be clearly noted that the term "lightfast" refers to dye colors lasting up to but not always beyond 100 years. Many dye colors are labeled with pigment names to confuse them with permanent colors that have no known lifespan when exposed to light.
- I would have to disagree with that. User:Yetmotega/1 Yetmotega (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Prismacolor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110714033951/http://www.prismacolor.com:80/products to http://www.prismacolor.com/products/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Entire product section should be redone
[edit]The Prismacolor article is written as if it was an essay to convince readers to buy from Prismacolor and not a neutral point of view. There is also parts that don't talk about the company, but are just tips for artists. A wikitable would be better suited for a listing of products instead of a review like this article has. Examples of this with other art brands like Winsor & Newton, Liquitex, Sakura, and Pentel. [[User:PlumPear|PlumPear]] ([[User talk:PlumPear|talk]]) (talk) 13:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)