Jump to content

Talk:Prion/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    There are a number of un-cited paragraphs. I think all paragraphs have reliable source links, now. -- MarcoTolo (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)  Done[reply]
    There are a number of citation needed tags, also some verification needed tags. First half done. -- MarcoTolo (talk) 00:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC) All done, I think. -- MarcoTolo (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)  Done[reply]
    I repaired some dead links and tagged others using WP:CHECKLINKS. Fixed. -- MarcoTolo (talk) 00:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)  Done[reply]
    There are a few bare URLs in the citations, please use templates to attribute publication date, author, publishers, etc. Fixed. -- MarcoTolo (talk) 00:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Overall the article is in fairly good shape. Main issue: Referencing as per above. ON hold until 7 March, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your hard work, the article is much improved, I am happy to confirm GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The citation given (3) does not support the statement referred to.Rotlor (talk) 03:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]