Talk:Principal type
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Principal type:
|
Woeful description
[edit]This is an absolutely horrible description. Full of circularities and gibbberish like "instances of a type". There's a better explanation here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11542446/what-is-a-principal-type — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.182.133.255 (talk) 06:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)