Talk:Princeton University Department of Psychology

Princeton University Department of Psychology is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 3, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Copy/paste

Much (but not all) of the Graduate section appears copied and pasted from the Psych Department's Graduate Programs pages. The section should be redone in an editor's own words. Also, the other sections of the article should be checked for possible WP:COPYPASTE violations. Lagrange613 (talk) 17:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the library section is a paraphrasing of the Psych Department's own "History of the Psychology Library" as noted in the banner. It's probably close enough to constitute a copyright violation. Lagrange613 (talk) 02:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out, it was reported by bot at WP:CP. I removed a lot of text and tried to reword some other areas. It was added in initial revisions and become foundational.--NortyNort (Holla) 10:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lagrange613 (talk) 15:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni list

The embedded list of alumni is way too long. If the associated footnotes are included it takes up about a quarter of the article's height. It should be shortened significantly. I propose deleting every list item that doesn't include a link to a WP article about the alum. Lagrange613 (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just pulled the trigger on this; it reduced the article's size by a third. The preceding lists of current and historical faculty could also use some trimming. Lagrange613 (talk) 00:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Demotion

I've culled the alumni list, but this article still has a number of issues, for example copy/paste and paraphrasing issues as I've noted above and dead links. It's therefore demoted to C class. Lagrange613 (talk) 00:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://psychlib.princeton.edu/history.htm, http://psych.princeton.edu/psychology/grad/social/index.php, etc. One archive here to show we copied from them. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 10:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Princeton University Department of Psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updating will fix broken links

I have fixed a bunch of broken links on this page, but many of the link problems are caused by the fact that this page is about a decade out of date. So facts like the number of graduate students or the department's ranking have changed and there is no point in finding archive urls for old data. Leschnei (talk) 12:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]