Jump to content

Talk:Princess Victoria Melita of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePrincess Victoria Melita of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
February 20, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 2, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
February 22, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 25, 2020.
Current status: Good article

Title

[edit]

Does anyone know what title Victoria Melita used between her divorce from Grand Duke Ernst of Hesse and her marriage to Grand Duke Cyril of Russia? I have added it in under her maiden name, as she might have gone back to that, but if she used another title that should be included. Prsgoddess187 15:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

[edit]

I've added images to this article, but I'd like to make sure they're all OK to use. The main photo was taken prior to World War I and appears to be from a German postcard. I copied it off a web site run by Jesus Ibarra. The web site address is listed with the photo information. His e-mail doesn't work, so I couldn't contact him for information. I think the general rule is that anything published prior to 1923 is in the public domain in the U.S. All of the photos used here look like they came from postcards that were published in Germany and elsewhere well before 1923. Please remove the photos if I'm wrong and they aren't public domain.--Bookworm857158367 22:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps

[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. There are however some problems with thearticle which should be addressed.

  • The lead is very short and should be extended to two paragraphs which give a clear picture of the princess and her life. At the moment the lead conspiculouly fails to provide an adequate introduction.
  • Nicknames like Ernie and Ducky are used throughout. These should be changed to their proper names. Not only is it unencyclopedic, its disconcerting for the reader.
  • I noticed a few contractions like "didn't". These should be converted to encyclopedic prose.
  • In the section on her daughters, the article has inline citations in the middle of sentances. These should be move to after punctuation.

The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
See centralised discussion at the WikiProject DBD 09:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feature article

[edit]

Lets see if the article can make it to FA status --Miguelemejia (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Princess Victoria Melita of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Solid article. Possible GA candidate. Use of images in this context qualifies as fair use, and is generally not a problem.Badbilltucker 22:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Princess Victoria Melita of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

caption to photo

[edit]

The photo says Princess and Grand Duchess. Underneath it has her title from her first marriage and 'tenure'. Why is this there? it sort of makes it look like that was her main title in her life.--2607:FEA8:D5DF:F945:DA5:33AC:5755:B7C6 (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]