Talk:Princess Lilibet of Sussex

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Princess Lilibet of Sussex article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Princess Lilibet of Sussex be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in California may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

On 8 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Princess Lilibet of Sussex. The result of the discussion was moved.

Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). COPIED AND PASTED FROM THE PAGE OF PRINCESS LILIBET OF SUSSEX:-

At the accession of Charles III, Lilibet became entitled to use the title "princess" and style "royal highness"

Although apparently small, this:- "style "royal highness" detail is incorrect, untrue and misleading, so should be deleted in order for the page to be honest & true. This detail was checked with Buckingham Palace - if you require to check, Buckingham Palace can be contact by letter or phone, using the details I post here:-

To contact Buckingham Palace London SW1A 1AA: Telephone (during 9am - 5pm (GMT) Monday to Friday) on: (+44) (0)20 7930 4832. NOTE: calls to this number may be recorded </ref> CobwebCottage (talk) 16:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I supplied an extremely reliable source: BUCKINGHAM PALACE, LONDON. UK.

I gave you the address and actual telephone number which can be used as a contact to have the information confirmed that Princess Lilibet of Sussex was NOT eligible to use the style of "Royal Highness". Only the title of Princess was given, so therefore she is Princess Lilibet of Sussex - but she is not entitled to use HRH or, Her "Royal Highness".

I supplied the most reliable source possible:- Buckingham Palace, along with their contact number which could be used to confirm the details I've given.

How much more reliable could a source be? CobwebCottage (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

an actual source would be required not just "call them yourself and see". Th

The HRH comes with the princess title. 173.212.65.254 (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify a little, please read Wikipedia's core policy Wikipedia:Verifiability.

"Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations."

'You can phone them and ask' is not a reliable published source so is not acceptable for Wikipedia.

Additionally, the stated assertion contradicts the cited sources in major media publications (who, I would guess, also know how to phone Buckingham Palace), and the fairly clear provisions of the 1917 letters patent ("the children of the sons of [the] Sovereign ... shall have and at all times hold and enjoy the style title or attribute of Royal Highness").

The person answering the phone at Buckingham Palace is not necessarily an expert on British constitutional law. TSP (talk) 11:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The correct English title is missing. Change Meghan Markle to Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. 162.255.1.56 (talk) 21:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the second sentence. The infobox uses maiden name. DrKay (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

add an image in the infobox

? maybe? QueenAnnaMaria (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images must comply with Wikipedia:Image use policy. There don't appear to be any free-use (i.e. uncopyrighted) images of her available. DrKay (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unsigned

In the part : 《An 8 March 2023 statement by a spokesperson for Lilibet's parents confirming her baptism days earlier marked the first time that her parents had publicly used her title of "princess", with the announcement referring to her as "Princess Lilibet Diana".》, shouldn't it say: 《An 8 March 2023 statement by a spokesperson for HER parents confirming her baptism days earlier marked the first time that thet had publicly used her title of "birth princess", with the announcement referring to her as "Princess Lilibet Diana of sussex"》— Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.64.103.124 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. "Birth princess" isn't a title. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]