Talk:Princess Auto

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Canada: Manitoba Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.

Updated information for timeline on Regina, Ottawa, and Home office expansion. ~~alphanitrate~~

Deca was sold by other retailers - but has been discontinued.

"quality controls etc." this sounds like opinion needs source, does this refer to the tools being made over seas are poor because of the QC, and the other tools made overseas that have better QC are better?

Alphanitrate (talk) 20:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content without sources

@174.115.100.93: Let's go through this:

1) You removed the list of cities and the citation for the stores and added "As of July 2019, Princess Auto has stores in every province except Quebec" This is still an unsourced claim.

2) You explain in the edit summery: "WP is not the place for an exhaustive list of cities with stores in them. Also, section neglects to state how many storesthere are in total"

3) I then good-faith reverted that through STiki due to the claim you added not having a source. I gave my reason on your talk page "Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Princess Auto, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! PoliceSheep99 (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)"

4) You then undid my revert stating in the edit summery "What's a reliable source for REMOVING stuff? Don't revert again until you get an adult's permission. Ouf."

5) On my talk page you put "I removed stuff, and then you reverted it claiming I didn't have a reliable source. You should learn how to Wikipedia before you presume to preach to (and revert!) others, FFS. Beat it, kid. 174.115.100.93 (talk) 04:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)"

I simply reverted an edit which added a claim "As of July 2019, Princess Auto has stores in every province except Quebec" that did not and still does not have a source. I would also like to bring to your attention WP:Etiquette of which it may be beneficial to familiarise yourself with to inform your conduct both on talk pages and in the edit summaries. The last thing anybody wants is to end up in an Wikipedia:Edit warring situation. Thank you - PoliceSheep99 (talk) 11:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]