Talk:Prince Chunk

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prince Chunk article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-08-13. The result of the discussion was keep.

Princess Chunk vs. Prince Chunk

Which would be a more appropriate title to this article?--DrWho42 (talk) 23:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There also seems to be some confusion from the articles as to what names (and by whom) Prince Chunk was given. Hopefully this will be cleared up.--DrWho42 (talk) 23:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation for Speedy Deletion

I'm recommending this article for speedy deletion as it falls within CSD criteria A7. It doesn't put forth any information that merits inclusion in an encyclopedia. Additionally, the author will be notified of this action and given a chance to defend it.

Cassius1213 (talk) 02:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it should be deletedKpstewart (talk) 16:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image?

Could someone upload an image with the proper tags? I tried earlier but it was deleted probably because I didn't use the right licensing tag (or what not). An image of the feline can be found along this article: New York Daily News. The credit they give for the image is Associated Press.--DrWho42 (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weight fail?

Is it just me, or did the owner (just on FOX News) say the cat never actually weighed forty-odd pounds? Maybe we should take that out of the article. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 12:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, apparently it was just you who said that the cat never actually weighed forty-odd pounds. LOL. Seriously, if you have a source citation, that would help us considerably. Anybody? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here you are. See paragraphs seven and eight. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 18:24, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had the impression you just saw something on television, for which you might have found a citation. As it is, I have revised the article a bit, in keeping with the evidence available and what I think is a healthy skepticism. See what you think. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 19:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good, thanks. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 19:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]