Talk:Primevil

Speedy deletion nomination of Primevil (band)

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Primevil (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rockgenre 03:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Keep- Passes 1 of WP:MUS for they were mentioned in published work. They were mentioned in Classic Rock (magazine). You can even view it here like you wish http://www.jptscareband.com/jptlostpioneers.pdf . Rockgenre (talk) 03:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Highly dubious: Since you can't link to it directly despite it being from just 2007 and the source isn't quite top-notch. If you're insisting this is a real copy there could be a copyvio issue, in which case it would not be permissible as a source. Only about 20% of the text in that pdf is an "interview", the rest of just self-published material and press releases; and huh. There's actually nowhere in the top 3 pages that even says it's Classic Rock Magazine. WP:PROVEIT, sorry, I can't buy it just it. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 04:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)