Talk:Prima Donna (opera)/Archive 1
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about Prima Donna (opera). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Insubstantial?
Resolved
This doesn't seem to be much more than an idea. Does it need an article? --Kleinzach 08:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Restoration discussion
|
---|
|
Synopsis
Resolved
As it currently stands, the synopsis comes directly from the opera program. Is this allowed, assuming the author of the summary is credited (Daniel Kramer), or does it need to be paraphrased and still credited? Sorry, I am not too familiar with proper procedure, but I want to make sure all rules are followed. Also, how does one credit the author? Is there a specific template or method for crediting an author of a synopsis or using a program as a source? Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 17:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- NOTE: If the synopsis is still verbatim or even contains verbatim sentences from the one used in the program, it is a copyright violation, and must be re-written or removed immediately, unless the original author has explicitly written to Wikipedia with consent to release it here under Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0. It is not enough to credit the source. Please read WP:COPYVIO and its associated pages for more information. Voceditenore (talk) 12:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying.
At the moment, the synopsis is verbatim (I thought crediting the author would be acceptable). I can work on a summary later--in the meantime, feel free to edit or remove if needed. I apologize for its inclusion.--Another Believer (Talk) 20:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC) - Update: The synopsis has been removed from the article. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying.