Talk:Price Tag

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Rip off of Leona Lewis' Better in Time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.175.115 (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appeared on Jay Leno

She sang on Jay Leno last week, should be included on Promotion. calvin999 (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Band Reference

There is definitely a reference to 30 Seconds to Mars in B.o.B.'s rap portion 174.101.90.206 (talk) 06:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actual price tags

I came here looking for an article discussing actual price tags and was disappointed to find no disambiguating link directing me there. This page certainly should have such a link and I would add it, but don't know where the appropriate article is. Could someone who does please do so? D4g0thur 05:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me as if the English Wikipedia doesn't have an article on price tags. If such an article were to be created, it would probably displace this article to "Price Tag (song)", as it would be the primary topic. Regards, decltype (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, does this illuminati stuff really belong?

This is a largely unsubstantiated fringe theory propagated by an extreme minority, none of them scholarly experts, and it's potentially defamatory to Jessie. I suggest that it should be deleted in accordance with WP:UNDUE and WP:BLP. Darthmix (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed this strange section. The only reason that I could see for an inclusion (but still shortening) would be the fact that Jessie J actually reacted to these accusations. Definitely support removing the quote and shorten the details, merging it into the "Music video" section, removing the fair use image and making a short mention of it, if not removing it altogether. After all, I doubt any of the Lady Gaga songs even mentions the Illuminati "accusations" against her. --The Evil IP address (talk) 22:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Tom (talk) 06:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Evil IP, for being the bold one and making the deletion. :) Darthmix (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

84bpm is uptempo?

"'Price Tag' is an up-tempo, 'feel good' track...."

"'Price Tag' is written in the key of F major with a tempo of 84 beats per minute."

I can see that the number of beats per minute can be at odds with whether the song is perceived as fast, slow or somewhere in the middle, as there are a number of other factors that influence it. But still, it seems strange to me to be calling it 'up-tempo' if it's only 84bpm. But still, it does have an upbeat feel to it. What do people think? Is 'upbeat' a better term than 'up-tempo'? — Smjg (talk) 17:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]