Jump to content

Talk:Pretty Persuasion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Teen film?

[edit]

Pretty Persuasion is not a teen film according to wikipedia's definition of such, "This is a list of "teen films," movies centering around the lives of teenagers, with teens as the target audience." This film adresses bestiality, anal sex, group sex, drug use, and racism, earning it a well deserved "R" title. While it does center around the lives of teenagers, its target audience is much more adult oriented then "teen films" implies.

I agree, and have removed the "teen" from the discription. It is a very hard core satire. Most teens do not get the very strong David Mamet theme that runs through. Even the diaglogue is a satire of Mamet.68.88.13.169 21:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Edited "somewhat became massively popular" to read "brief exposure". Oxymorons make me cry. GodHead 23:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Postmodern?

[edit]

After watching this film, i ask myself: Is this what is often called post-modern? The interplay of truth-possibilities, the twisting of the story, the artificiality of life? -- ExpImptalkcon 01:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes

[edit]

i will later move them to wikiquotes.


--Headmaster


--Kimberly



comedy

[edit]

the film is not a comedy, I'm sure. it starts like one, but then the film makes a 180° turning in the very end. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.52.138.34 (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Agreed, black comedy and satire probably need reliable sources. It is obviously social commentary with some dark humour and exaggerates various characters. We gotta go fetch dem critics views. Alastair Haines (talk) 06:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JanePrettyPersuasion.jpg

[edit]

Image:JanePrettyPersuasion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pretty Persuasion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pretty Persuasion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]