Jump to content

Talk:Presidential Emergency Operations Center

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Presidential Emergency Operations Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More sources

[edit]

http://search.archives.gov/search?affiliate=national-archives&query=%22presidential+emergency+operations+center%22&sitelimit=georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov&submit.x=0&submit.y=0

Cantab1985 (talk) 06:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

specially or specialized ?

[edit]

"Day to day, the PEOC is staffed around the clock by specialized picked joint-service military officers and non-commissioned officers." are they specialized officers and non-coms, or are they specially picked ? 84.215.194.30 (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

e

Care Needs To Be Taken With Quotes

[edit]

If quotes are going to be included, they should not include only sensational bits, or omitting parts of a full quote when the sentiment would be misrepresented.

This is not the place for political bias, take that to your own pages and keep articles objective and true to the sentiment.

For context here, I am apolitical and do not associate or identify with any political party. I am however incredibly adamant about true representation of events, good, bad and ugly. It is a disservice to the community to operate any other way. Anpu90 (talk) 20:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also not the place to add titillating, irrelevant, out-of-scope, undue, unencyclopedic bits of gossip from someone's book. This article is about a federal building and the notable events that occurred there...not the irrelevant "gotcha" words this or that person may have uttered there. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]