Talk:Prescription (sovereignty transfer)

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

Move to Prescription (international law)

It seems to me that this should be moved to Prescription (international law) and the example from Quebec moved somewhere else, probably to Adverse possession. --V111P 02:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the change (cur) (prev) 22:38, 12 February 2010 79.145.101.128 (talk) (3,792 bytes) (undo), I have to say that there are no clear references to support what was said on a non-pacific prescription.

Major Re-Write Needed This article opens with one topic -- prescription in international law -- and then switches to a totally different topic -- prescription within domestic property law -- and creates the erroneous impression that the latter explains or exemplifies the former. Also, since it discussions examples of prescription solely from civil law jurisdictions, it creates the false impression that prescription does not exist under common law regimes, which is not so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.12.4 (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above and accordingly I have

jnestorius^(talk) 16:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]