Talk:Premier Cruises
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Anyone please comment and assist in improving this articleMiami33131 (talk) 18:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- I added some formatting. The article desperately needs some reliable sources added as references (from books, web sites, newspapers, etc). Also, it looks like the paragraph that starts "Premier Cruise Line" is redundant to information that's in that cruise line's own article, so not needed in this article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:42, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- FYI: It still needs work to meet Wikipedia standards ... and I think the cruise line paragraph should be removed (redundant to that article) ... but overall I think it looks good enough to me at this point to be posted to Premier Cruises ... but be certain to post it at the page that currently contains the redirect. Not on the Premier Cruise Line page.
- It wouldn't hurt (and could potentially help quite a bit) to first post on the two pages I mentioned earlier on your talk page, and request other input. But it won't cause problems if you don't. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:54, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- I believe that bare url references are deprecated. You'll need to use {{cite web}} for the references. Generally you can get away with url, title, publisher, language (if not English) and accessdate. Mjroots (talk) 08:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)