Preaching chords is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
There are still insufficient sources to establish this as a separate topic / topic suitable for a separate article. Should it be a part of the Call and response article? Or my first thought is that it might be broadened and renamed into an article on call and response preaching style in American churches. North8000 (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There's already an article on Black preaching (which seems to be what you're referring to), but I think this is a big enough topic that a separate article certainly can be argued. Further, I would venture to guess that insufficient inclusion of sources is different from "insufficient sources". Insufficient inclusion by no means warrants an article being deleted or merged. But it seems a lot of Wikipedia editors have no interest in trying to find sources. Though I don't necessarily care to be the one to do it here, but I think the addition of a few articles could fill this one out pretty well. natemup (talk) 12:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Natemup:@IntellectualChristianWikiUser:IMO the practice / style that this article refers to is something that needs to be covered in Wikipedia. But IMO this article under this title isn't the way to do it. It sort of creates the term "Preaching chords" and in the sparse amount of actual available references (two references) there is zero mention of the term, (and one mention of "preacher chords") nor any coverage of "chords" aspect specifically. I did a quick scan of related article and don't see real coverage of this style and would be willing to help to see that it somehow gets covered. The Black churches article really doesn't have it and is too broad to have much of a place for good coverage of this topic. The Call and response and Black sermonic tradition articles might be good places for such coverage although neither has much on it. Maybe merging this into one of those and expanding it might be a good thing. I'd be interested in helping. North8000 (talk) 13:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Given the amount and nature of results that come up when one Googles "preaching chords", It seems a stretch to say that this article is creating the term. I'm all for renaming the page to "preacher chords", but I don't think this page should be deleted or merged. We can agree that this page needs work, though. natemup (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I originally came here just in my NPP duties. I came back only because I watch the page and you made a post. Mostly I think we just need to have a good & viable plan on how to cover this area. I think that that you are right that this article is not creating this term. I don't plan to AFD; I would actually oppose anything that would result in the loss of the content of this article.North8000 (talk) 17:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]