Talk:Prayer rope

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy.

Byzantine Rite Catholics

Many Catholics that are members of the Sui Iuris Churches of the Byzantine Rite also use the prayer rope as a form of devotion. This article makes it seem like it is a solely Eastern Orthodox tradition Adam (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Prayer rope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110213041727/http://www.st-george-church.org:80/English/Prayer_Rope.htm to http://st-george-church.org/English/Prayer_Rope.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

make a page with all similar objects

Religious people are racists and hate that list.

praycounters

Japamala, Japa Mala, Japa beads
koboschini
Rosary
add entry few data for Aboriginal non-Abrahamic animistic ropes
add entry
...

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prayer rope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060210163108/http://firebirdvideos.com/videos/videosinenglish/prayerrope.htm to http://www.firebirdvideos.com/videos/videosinenglish/prayerrope.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

How helpful is the list of ten translations? —Tamfang (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct! And I note that many Orthodox/Byzantine Rite articles likewise have what you are complaining of.

The Manual of Style agrees with you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section#Usage_in_first_sentence

And I note that it suggests, "Consider footnoting foreign-language names if they would otherwise clutter the first sentence."

Therefore, I will proceed to do that. Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]