Talk:Pratt & Whitney F119

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Move

I recommend a rename to Pratt & Whitney F119 in order to fit in with convention. -PW-100 only refers to a specific variant. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 15:23, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Vegaswikian 02:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

weight

How much does this thing weigh? I think it has to be far lighter than its predecessors, but I can find no information as to the weight of it.

afterburner?

Presumably the exact thrust is classified, but is the 35,000lb with or without afterburners?92.21.137.113 (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should be clear as maximum thrust is with afterburner. In any event another editor clarified this in the article. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

F119-PW-100 Relevance

Seeing as how the F-22 uses the F119-PW-100 variant, and in fact its what you're directed to on the Pratt & Whitney website, I think its worth mentioning in the article's text. Also, I have read several published sources that state the maximum thrust of the F119 to be 39,000 lbs. I'm not sure if this is classified, or simply an early and inaccurate estimate. Either way, I think we can all agree that the thrust of the F119 is greater than 35,000 lbs., so I think "+" should be added after "35,000" under "Performance." Wrend (talk) 07:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's been addressed. I add a ">" before the values. Adding a plus would probably mess up the convert template used there for the unit conversion. -Fnlayson (talk) 12:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pratt & Whitney F119. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060618052729/http://www.f22-raptor.com/technology/data.html to http://www.f22-raptor.com/technology/data.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]